S15. Man on a Mission v Purposeless Man
- Richard Vanderkolk
- May 24, 2020
- 1 min read
It seems that aetheists want to cling to the thought of randomness. This randomness would deceptively point to advantages. If there is no God, then I am not ultimately accountable for my actions, however the gospel is that Jesus has taken ultimate accountability for our actions by dieting on the cross on our behalf.
While physics is struggling with the theories of randomness and now due to the most recent discoveries in quantum physics, the role of observation and consciousness playing a part in the universe functions, it seems that the more humanitarian sciences and personal development programmers seem to all recognise the need for purpose. Even in his aetheism, Stephen Hawking realise the need to find purpose in his work.
Purpose is necessary for mental health and a rewarding life, which is why most personal development programmers will start with trying to develop a mission statement for you life.
If everything is random, then purpose would not make sense, but within us all, we recognise the need for purpose - a reason to live that goes beyond the procreation of our species.
This only makes sense if their was a purpose for our existence and that can only be possible if their was purpose behind our existence, which is what the Bible clearly teaches us because we were created (on purpose and with purpose) by God.
ARE YOU SURE ... that randomness makes more sense than purpose?



Comments